Wave questions II

Consider the musical note G, 392 Hz.  Find the following:

1.  The frequencies of the next two G's, one and two octaves above.

2.  The frequency of the G one octave lower than 392 Hz.

3.  The frequency of G#, one semi-tone (piano key or guitar fret) above this G.

4.  The frequency of A#, 3 semi-tones above G.
5.  The wavelength of the 392 Hz sound wave, assuming that the speed of sound is 340 m/s.

 >

 6.  Describe the Doppler Effect.

 7.  An ambulance (emitting a 1000 Hz tone) approaches you and then passes you.  Describe the tone heard in these situations.  Give answers as 'greater than 1000 Hz', 'equal to 1000 Hz', or 'less than 1000 Hz.'

 a.  What tone does the ambulance driver hear as they approach you?
b.  What tone do you hear as the ambulance approaches you?
c.  What tone does the ambulance driver hear after they pass you?
d.  What tone do you hear after they pass you?


Note that I will not ask you to perform the calculation on a test, but rather just set it up.

Answers:

1.  392 x 2 = 784 Hz; 392 x 4 = 1568 Hz

2.  392/2 = 196 Hz

3.  392 x 1.0594 = 415 Hz

4.  392 x 1.0594 x 1.0594 x 1.0594  (or 392 x 1.0594^3) = 466 Hz

5.  wavelength = speed / frequency = 340/392 = 0.87 m

 6 and 7 - see class notes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Newton's take on Gravitation - the inverse square law

Image
Newton's take on gravity and orbits - which is the genesis of our modern conception of it, is based on: Universal Gravitation (1687, Principia) Newton's take on orbits was quite different. For him, Kepler's laws were a manifestation of the bigger "truth" of universal gravitation. That is: All bodies have gravity unto them. Not just the Earth and Sun and planets, but ALL bodies (including YOU). Of course, the gravity for all of these is not equal. Far from it. The force of gravity can be summarized in an equation: or.... the force of gravitation is equal to a constant ("big G") times the product of the masses, divided by the distance between them (between their centers, to be precise) squared. Big G = 6.67 x 10^-11, which is a tiny number - therefore, you need BIG masses to see appreciable gravitational forces. This is an INVERSE SQUARE law, meaning that: - if the distance between the bodies is doubled, the force becomes 1/4 of its ...
Read more

Lenses and how they form images

Image
Lenses As shown and discussed in class, light refracts TOWARD a normal line (dotted line on the left image, perpendicular to surface of lens) when entering a more dense medium. Note in this  convex  lens that this direction of bend changes from down (with the top ray) to up with the bottom ray. This is due to the geometry of the lens. Look at the picture to make sure that this makes sense.  As a result, the rays will intersect after leaving the lens.  An image can form! The FOCAL LENGTH (f) of a lens (or curved mirror) where the light rays would intersect, but ONLY IF THEY WERE INITIALLY PARALLEL to each other. Otherwise, they intersect at some other point, or maybe not at all (if the object is too close to be focused on)! Note that your (human) eye lenses are convex - slightly thicker in the middle.  Thus, your eyes form "real" images on the retina - upside-down!  Unless, of course, the object is too close. If an image is projected onto ...
Read more

Electromagnetism and Electromagnetic Induction

Image
Electromagnetism Recall that the motion of charges leads to magnetic fields.   If you have charge traveling through a wire, electrons can be thought of as moving together – this causes a magnetic field, also known as electromagnetism.  The magnetic field caused by a current passing through a wire is often small, but if you coil the wire upon itself, the magnetic fields “add up”.  Several hundred turns of wire (with current running through it) can produced quite a strong electromagnet.  A coil with current running through it can naturally react to a permanent magnet – if this is engineered well, we have a motor.  See illustrations and demos in class. Below:  basic motors Electromagnetic Induction So, current causes magnetism – something shown in the early 19 th  century by Hans Oersted.  As it happens, the reverse is also true – magnetism can cause current, but there must be some relative CH...
Read more